Advantages of Powder Metallurgy Vs. Die Casting.

Posted by Horizon Technology - November 19, 2018

When order volume exceeds a few dozen, process economics dictate a near-net shape manufacturing process with little after-work necessary. Many engineers and buyers gravitate to die casting, but there are good reasons for considering powder metal -- especially as new uses, materials, and design possibilities are unlocked thanks to evolving technology and understanding of powder metallurgy.

Here we'll compare the two and explain the many advantages of powder metallurgy (and perhaps a caveat or two).

Advantages of Powder Metallurgy & Die Casting: Overview

Both powder metallurgy and die casting entail filling a die or mold that forms your desired shape. Then the formed part is released -- this process influences part and tool design.

And that's where the similarities end.

In die casting, molten metal is poured into the die, where it freezes. After release, it usually goes through several machining operations and often a heat treatment.

In contrast, the powder metal process involves use of cold powder. (Some variants do involve heating the powder, but not to melting point.) When the die is full, an upper tool comes down to compact the powder. The die then opens, and the part is ejected.

Many powder metal parts then go through sintering, which fuses the mix into a fully hardened piece.

Where Powder Metallurgy and Die Casting Separate


In die casting, a turbulent liquid fills the cavity. Sometimes this will trap air, leading to non-fills (your material doesn’t fully fill the mold). Oxide skin can drop into the liquid to create internal defects, and flow lines and porosity are common. To verify integrity and detect defective parts after casting, sometimes you need:

  • Leak testing
  • X-rays
  • Other inspection

One of the advantages of powder metallurgy is consistency. A uniform weight of powder is deposited into the die on each cycle, and compacted to the same density. Providing the powder metal manufacturer follows good housekeeping practices and avoids powder contamination, internal defects are highly unlikely.

A second advantage is control over microstructure. In die casting this is determined by cooling rate, which varies depending on factors like surface area and volume. Powder metallurgy provides much greater control and consistency, plus an ability to form finer microstructures. Why does this matter to the designer? It makes it especially skilled at producing hard, tough components -- think high-speed steel tools.

Material Implications

Die casting is most commonly employed with nonferrous materials such as:

  • Aluminum
  • Magnesium
  • Zinc

This is primarily because those metals have low melting points.

Powder metallurgy allows far greater flexibility in material usage. In particular, while there are “standard” powder metal materials, it's also feasible to blend powders. This allows creation of specific properties -- such as high magnetic performance for an electric motor component -- and high melting point materials.

Powder metal usually consists of one of more of these metals:

  • Stainless steel
  • Iron
  • Nickel
  • Titanium
  • Copper
  • Silicon
  • Phosphorus

Mechanical Properties

Die casting offer nice shape-making capabilities compared with some other processes. However, you can make use of the same design possibilities with powder metallurgy, but with better mechanical properties.

Look at the section above. The materials used with die casting are not magnetic. Unless they’re set inside another component made of another metal, there’s no magnetic applicability there. Powder metal, however, has a wide variety of magnetic materials available.

Another issue with die cast pieces is that they’re flimsy and easily broken. Powder metal parts generally stand up to more abuse.


Component design is the primary driver of cost, although designs can be tailored to suit the preferred forming process. However, there are differences between die casting and powder metallurgy that have significant cost implications.   

  • Material use/yield. Scrap rates are lower with powder metallurgy, a huge benefit when using higher-value materials like copper and stainless steel
  • Secondary processing. Die-cast parts almost always need trimming to remove flash, plus some machining operations and possibly heat treatment. Most powder metal parts need little to no secondary processing.   
  • Energy consumption. Melting metal is energy-intensive, and more so for materials with a higher melting point. While sintering is also energy-intensive, total consumption can be less than for casting.


Many of us played with matchbox cars growing up. That’s a perfect example of die casting. The metal shell of the car was an intricate shape ideal for this process. (Sadly, Matchbox cars are plastic nowadays.)

Other, more important uses of die casting over the years include:

  • Emblems on automobiles
  • Wheels for trains die cast
  • Rods in two-stroke engines

Now, with powder metal, we play with Porsches and Mercedes cars -- real ones.

We’ve covered uses for powder metal ad nauseum, but here’s a quick reminder of the industries and applications that can benefit from powder metal:

  • Electric motors
  • Automotive
  • Lawn & garden
  • Power tools
  • Aerospace
  • Oil & gas

Consider Both Processes

Powder metallurgy and die casting are both near-net shape processes. (Though we’d argue powder metallurgy can create a true net shape part.)

However, there are many situations in which powder metallurgy has clear advantages. This is especially true when working with higher-value and high-melting-point materials. Finally, remember powder metallurgy offers far greater flexibility in terms of the materials use -- therefore expanding your design possibilities!

Powder Metallurgy vs. Competing Methods

Topics: Powdered Metallurgy, Materials, Applications, Costs, Properties

Recent Posts

What Are the Best Materials for Electric Motor Design?

read more

Introduction to Magnetics & Powdered Metal

read more

The Future of Internal Combustion Engine Design: 5 Trends for 2020

read more